A group of Tesla Inc. investors stands to recover an average of about $12,000 a head for losses they incurred from Elon Musk’s famous 2018 tweet that he had “funding secured” to take the carmaker private at $420 a share — and then didn’t.
Most Read from Bloomberg
The US Securities and Exchange Commission aims to pay the investors the $40 million plus interest that Tesla’s chief executive officer and the company agreed to as civil penalties to settle a lawsuit by the regulator. That’s just over half the $80 million the SEC reckons they lost from the stock’s gyrations after the tweet — and a mere sliver of the $12 billion in losses an expert witness for a class of Tesla investors calculated earlier this year in a separate class action trial.
The SEC asked a judge for final approval of the plan in a court filing Wednesday evening.
A total of 3,350 claims will be paid out of the fund set up from the settlement if the plan is approved, according to the filing. That works out to just under $12,400 an investor, on average. The judge said Thursday he would sign off on the plan on Sept. 1 if there are no objections from Tesla or Musk, the world’s richest person.
What accounts for the huge gap in estimated losses between the $80 million and the $12 billion? It’s not entirely clear, but the expert’s number applied to losses by all Tesla investors over 10 days after the Aug. 7, 2018, tweet. The SEC’s number covers just over 27 hours after the tweet, excludes options and derivative trades and applies only to Tesla common stock. And not every eligible investor filed a claim.
The investors in the class action case lost at trial in February, when the jury took just two hours to clear Musk of their claim that he defrauded them with the tweet. The case was one of the few corporate securities fraud claims to go to trial. The vast majority are thrown out or settled.
The investors are appealing.
In the 2018 SEC settlement, Musk and Tesla each agreed to pay $20 million in civil penalties, and that the CEO’s company-related Twitter posts would be screened by a company lawyer.
Musk and Tesla paid the money, but Musk began to chafe at the supervision of his social media posts, claiming the deal violated his right to free expression and that the SEC was harassing him. A federal appeals court in May rejected those arguments, ruling against Musk’s attempts to nullify the agreement.
The regulatory case is SEC v. Musk, 18-cv-08865, US District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).
Read More: ‘Teflon’ Elon Wins Again as Jury Rejects Tweet Fraud Claims
(Adds background at bottom.)
Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek